Library of Ashurbanipal · MELEK

Library›Substances and pharmacology›Do the Math Tryptophan Turkey Phenibut and Hair of the Dog

Do the Math Tryptophan Turkey Phenibut and Hair of the Dog

Do the Math: Tryptophan, Turkey, Phenibut and Hair of the Dog is the arithmetic page. Four claims that circulate constantly — milk makes serotonin, turkey makes you sleepy, phenibut is a harmless supplement, hair of the dog cures a hangover — and in each case the useful move is the same: work out the actual quantity, and work out what else arrives with it. Two of the four turn out to be true in a narrower form than advertised, one is false for a reason worth understanding, and one is a genuine physical dependence that people walk into because it is sold in a tub.

1. The transporter is the whole story

Before any of it: tryptophan does not get into the brain on its own merits. It crosses the blood-brain barrier on LAT1, a transporter it shares with the other large neutral amino acids — leucine, isoleucine, valine, tyrosine, phenylalanine, methionine, histidine.

So what matters is never how much tryptophan you ate. It is the ratio:

Trp : ΣLNAA

That single fact explains every result below, and it is why "high-tryptophan food" lists are nearly useless. A protein-rich food raises tryptophan and raises its competitors at the same time — often enough to leave the ratio unchanged or worse. See The Tryptamine Family and Endogenous Neurochemistry and Catecholamines Transporters and Monoamine Reuptake.

The two things that actually move the ratio

2. "Tryptamine from milk" — what is actually true

The honest correction first: you do not get tryptamine from milk in any meaningful quantity. Tryptamine is a decarboxylation product of tryptophan and is a trace amine in humans. What milk supplies is tryptophan, and the serotonin route is Trp → 5-HTP (via tryptophan hydroxylase, which needs BH4) → serotonin — see L-Methylfolate for why the cofactor is the bottleneck.

What is genuinely established:

3. Turkey — the arithmetic, which settles it

The claim: turkey is high in tryptophan, therefore the Thanksgiving nap.

Step one: how much tryptophan is in turkey?

Roughly 250–350 mg per 100 g of cooked turkey breast.

Step two: is that high?

No. It is unremarkable. Per 100 g, chicken is about the same. Pork, beef, salmon and tuna are comparable or higher. Parmesan is roughly double. Soybeans, pumpkin seeds, sesame and spirulina are higher still per 100 g. Turkey is not special, and the entire premise of the myth is a food-composition error.

Step three: what dose actually does anything?

Studies of L-tryptophan for sleep onset use 1 g and upward; the sedative and mood literature generally works in the 1–5 g range.

To get 3 g of tryptophan from turkey you would need roughly 1 kilogram of turkey breast. Not a portion — a kilogram.

Step four: the step that actually kills the myth

Even the kilogram would not work, because turkey is protein. Eating it delivers tryptophan together with all of its competitors at LAT1. The Trp:LNAA ratio does not rise — it typically falls. A high-protein meal reduces brain tryptophan availability. That is the opposite of the claimed mechanism.

So why is everyone asleep?

The turkey myth is the best short exercise in the library for why "contains X" is never an answer. The questions are always how much, compared to what, and what came with it. Compare Molar Stoichiometry Powder Density and Tolerance Kinetics.

4. Phenibut — the one that is genuinely physically addictive

⚠️ This section is a warning, and it is the most important on the page.

What it is

Why it catches people

The withdrawal, stated plainly

Phenibut withdrawal is a GABAergic withdrawal, and it belongs in the same category as benzodiazepine and alcohol withdrawal — not in the same category as caffeine. Documented features include:

The harm-reduction content, which is the reason this is on the page rather than omitted:

5. Coffee, alcohol and nicotine — subtler, and not equivalent

The operator's framing is right: these three are more subtle than phenibut, and they are not subtle in the same way as each other. The variable that separates them is what withdrawal does.

6. Hair of the dog

Why it works, which is also why it is a bad idea

There is a real mechanism, and it is instructive:

What the evidence supports

Honestly: not much, and nothing cures a hangover.

The recipes, as culture

Worth having because they are real traditions and because almost all of them are salt, acid, capsaicin, broth and carbohydrate — i.e. rehydration and food wearing a costume:

7. Nootropics generally — the tiers

Since this is the page people arrive at from that word:

Sources

Filed under  Substances and pharmacology