Library of Ashurbanipal · MELEK

Library›Substances and pharmacology›Alzheimers and Parkinsons What Treatment Actually Exists

Alzheimers and Parkinsons What Treatment Actually Exists

Alzheimer's and Parkinson's: What Treatment Actually Exists is a plain inventory of the two most common neurodegenerative diseases and what can be done about them today, separated strictly into approved, investigational and unproven. Both diseases attract an enormous volume of hopeful writing, and the reason to be severe about the tiers is that families make real decisions off these sentences. Nothing here is individual medical advice; it is the map of the territory so that a conversation with a neurologist starts further along.

1. What the two diseases are

2. Alzheimer's — what is approved

Symptomatic (decades old, modest, real)

Disease-modifying — the anti-amyloid antibodies

This is the genuinely new thing, and it needs stating with its costs.

What is coming

3. Parkinson's — what is approved

Dopamine replacement, which still dominates

Extending and smoothing it

Device therapy, which is often underused

The non-motor disease, which deserves equal billing

Constipation, orthostatic hypotension, REM sleep behaviour disorder, depression, apathy, pain, drooling, and the cognitive end of the disease. Each has its own management, and together they often matter more to a patient than tremor does. A treatment plan that only addresses movement is half a plan.

Exercise, which is the most under-prescribed intervention in either disease

For Parkinson's, exercise has better evidence than any supplement on the internet. High-intensity aerobic training, resistance training, and amplitude-based programmes (LSVT BIG, boxing-style classes, tango) all have trial support for function, and the SPARX line of trials has been testing whether high-intensity endurance exercise is disease-modifying. It is the one thing on this page that is free, available today, and unambiguously worth doing. See Routes for Backpacking Pilgrimages and Building Muscle Tissue.

4. The investigational tier, including the failures that teach most

5. The unproven tier, stated as such

These appear constantly and each gets one honest line.

6. Where our own work touches this

We have a research line here and it should be described at its true strength, which is early.

7. How to read a claim about either disease

  1. Approved, investigational or unproven? Say which. Most writing on these diseases blurs the three deliberately.
  2. Slowing, stopping or reversing? Nothing reverses either disease. Lecanemab slows.
  3. Which stage? A drug for early Alzheimer's is useless in late Alzheimer's, and may be harmful.
  4. Species and endpoint. Mouse amyloid is not human cognition. A worm is not a person.
  5. What did the biggest trial say? Not the most exciting trial — the biggest and most recent. Exenatide, CoQ10, creatine, nicotine and aducanumab are all cases where the small hopeful result was followed by a large disappointing one.
  6. And remember who is reading. Somebody searching these words at 2 a.m. has a parent who just got a diagnosis. That is the reason the tiers are labelled, and the reason not to blur them.

Sources

Filed under  Substances and pharmacology