Library›Religion and practice›Origin Myths of Race and Ancestry Yakub Blumenbach and the Aryan Myth

Origin Myths of Race and Ancestry Yakub Blumenbach and the Aryan Myth

Origin Myths of Race: Yakub, Blumenbach and the Aryan Myth lays out, side by side, the major stories told about where "races" came from — religious, scientific and political — each in its own terms, followed by what genetics has since shown. Describing a teaching is not endorsing it. Alpha.

1. The curse of Ham

Text: Genesis 9:20–27 has Noah curse Canaan, son of Ham, to be a servant of his brothers. The text says nothing about skin colour.
History: Medieval and early-modern writers — Jewish, Christian and Muslim — reread the curse as falling on Africans, and it was used to justify slavery in the Atlantic world.

2. Blumenbach and "Caucasian" (1775–1795)

Johann Friedrich Blumenbach divided humanity into five "varieties": Caucasian, Mongolian, Ethiopian, American and Malay.
He named "Caucasians" after a skull from Georgia he considered the most beautiful, and believed the Caucasus the likely homeland of the first humans, from which the other varieties "degenerated" through climate.
Blumenbach himself stressed that the varieties blend into each other and rejected ranking them intellectually — later race science kept his names and dropped his caveats.

3. The Aryan myth

19th-century philologists found that Sanskrit, Persian, Greek, Latin and the Germanic languages were related ("Indo-European"); Arya was a self-name in the Rigveda and the Avesta.
Arthur de Gobineau (Essay on the Inequality of the Human Races, 1853) turned a language family into a master race whose purity decided the fate of civilisations. Houston Stewart Chamberlain and then the Nazis built on him.
Genetics: the Indo-European languages did spread in part with steppe ancestry (Haak et al. 2015), but that ancestry mixed everywhere it went; there was never a pure "Aryan" population, and speakers of the languages today span every appearance.

4. The Hamitic hypothesis

Colonial-era writers (notably C. G. Seligman, 1930) claimed that anything advanced in Africa had been brought by lighter-skinned "Hamitic" invaders. The idea shaped Belgian rule in Rwanda, where ID cards classed Tutsi and Hutu partly by nose width and height — a policy later linked to the 1994 genocide.

5. Yakub (Nation of Islam)

Teaching: In the teaching of W. D. Fard and Elijah Muhammad (Message to the Blackman in America, 1965), the original people were Black. About 6,600 years ago a scientist named Yakub, exiled to the island of Patmos with his followers, bred a white race over some 600 years by selecting lighter children in each generation. Louis Farrakhan has continued to teach versions of it.
Genetics: light-skin variants are far older than 6,600 years, some older than Homo sapiens itself; blondness and light skin arose several times independently; and their spread in Europe is explained by migration and natural selection (see Skin Hair and Eye Colour Ancestry and Genetics). The teaching's core claim — that all humans descend from dark-skinned African ancestors — is correct.

6. What the evidence shows

All living humans descend mainly from African Homo sapiens populations, with small archaic contributions (Neanderthal, Denisovan, and in Africa other archaic groups).
Most genetic variation lies within populations, not between them (Lewontin 1972; confirmed by genome studies).
Skin colour is a sunlight adaptation that evolved in both directions many times; it is a poor guide to ancestry.
Every stated "pure race" dissolves in ancient DNA into mixtures of older populations.
Hypothesis: the operator offers his own account of how light phenotypes arose, set out with the evidence for and against on The Temple Lineage Hypothesis (Van Kush Ancestry).

Sources

Blumenbach J. F., De generis humani varietate nativa (3rd ed. 1795). Gobineau A. de, Essai sur l'inégalité des races humaines (1853–55).
Muhammad E., Message to the Blackman in America (1965). Seligman C. G., Races of Africa (1930).
Haak W. et al. 2015, Nature 522. Lewontin R. 1972, Evolutionary Biology 6.

Filed under Religion and practice